Skip to main content
Four questions decide the model. Answer them in order and stop at the first one that forces your hand.

​
1. Can the data leave your infrastructure at all?

If a written policy says test data, prompts or evaluation results must never leave your own cloud subscription or data center, the platform has to run in your account. One more question picks between the two models that fit. Does your team want to operate the platform? If not, the answer is managed in your cluster (model 4): your account, your network, your data, with Galtea deploying and operating the platform on it and your team able to approve each change first. If yes, or if no third party may hold any operational role at all, the answer is self-hosted (model 5). If the data may sit in Galtea-operated infrastructure under a contract, continue.

​
2. Do you need dedicated infrastructure or a specific region?

If you need a dedicated cloud account, a specific region for data residency, your own database and storage, or a network you control, the answer is private tenant (model 3). Galtea still operates it, so your team takes on no Kubernetes work. If shared, logically isolated infrastructure is acceptable, continue.

​
3. Do you need guaranteed capacity or your own identity provider?

Evaluations and data generation are the compute-heavy part of the platform. If you need them processed with priority and never queued behind other customers, or you need your users to sign in through your corporate identity provider with your own MFA policy, the answer is enterprise organization (model 2).

​
4. Otherwise

Shared SaaS (model 1). Fastest to start, zero infrastructure on your side, always on the latest version.

​
Decision path

​
Common misreadings

“Shared means other customers can see our data.” No. In the shared models every record (products, tests, evaluations, results) is scoped to one organization, and every request is checked against the caller’s organization and role. Organizations never see each other’s data. What is shared is the compute and the database instance, not the data visibility. “Self-hosted is the most secure option.” Not automatically. Self-hosted moves the responsibility to you: patching, backups, monitoring, capacity and incident response become your team’s work, and a platform nobody has time to operate is less secure, not more. If the requirement is that data stays in your account, model 4 satisfies it without that transfer: same perimeter, Galtea still operating the platform. If the requirement is dedicated infrastructure rather than your own account, a private tenant gives you that with no infrastructure work at all. “We must pick one forever.” No. The models sit on one axis of isolation, and the product surface is identical. Starting on shared SaaS for a pilot and moving to a private tenant for production is a normal path.

​
Cost and effort, qualitatively